Thursday, October 11, 2012

WEEK OF 10/8/12 MEETINGS IN REVIEW


TOM'S TALES FOR THE WEEK

Submitted to Shelton Blog by Tom Davis  Mason County Progressive

Tuesday, October 9, 2012
 

 9:00 AM: Regular session of Board of County Commissioners

There were only five items on the agenda this week, as commissioners struggle to keep their heads down until after the election. As a result, recent meetings have become little more than a platform from which the current crop of political tigers attempt to change their stripes.

Bob Simmons, Director, WSU Mason County Extension, introduced two new members of AmeriCorps to the Board. Commissioner Sheldon took the opportunity to recall his own community service, and all hearts crackled with warmth, at least until the issue of commissioner salaries reared its ugly head. I blame the weather: one second the sun is shining, the next we’re being beaten to the ground in a political maelstrom. Making matters worse, is an exceptionally hot wind blowing in from Commissioner District No. 2.

Sheldon wasted no time casting his bait upon the waters, complaining that my comments are always politically motivated, and attacking my blog posts. But what Sheldon was really fishing for was an opportunity to state on the public record that he had returned his salary raise to the County, which he apparently thinks is the same as not getting one. So backward and downward we spiraled through a history of automatic pay increases, reassigning blame and generally doing whatever was needed to draw attention away from the issue. You know, the usual stuff.
Commissioner Bloomfield jumped in to ask me to be patient, a reasonable request under most circumstances. Here are a few of the comments I’ve had to put up with after waiting patiently for the commissioners to address my concerns: “You’re new here"; "You’re from California"; "You’re misinformed"; "You’re being political"; "You have an agenda"; and my all-time favorite, “You’re telling us how to run the County". Now, after kicking the can down the road for the past four (some would say eight) years, the commissioners ask that we all be patient while they trade one bad mechanism for pay increases for another.
Some commissioners would like to silence opposing voices altogether. They say they don’t, but their actions tell a different story: Citizens are not allowed to speak at briefings, and we can’t respond to commissioner comments at meetings, no matter how wrong-headed, insipid or untrue. It’s kind of like a game, though the stakes are pretty high: every time they win, we lose another opportunity to be heard.
Recent history tells us that when it comes to addressing citizen concerns, our commissioners are lousy with excuses, windy as the day is long and painfully short on action. But put their pay check on the block for some serious cutting and they’ll snatch it off faster than a New York second.
(Note: Some of my comments may not apply to all the commissioners all of the time; it’s not my job to make clear those distinctions, it’s theirs.)
Next up was John Gunter, Chair of the Belfair Citizens Advisory Committee. John is bright, well-intentioned and enthusiastic, maybe a bit too enthusiastic. He wrote what most people would assume was a confidential email to Commissioners Sheldon and Ring-Erickson, asking that the available grant money for the construction of Phase ll of the Belfair Sewer Project be rejected. 
In a shameless demonstration of political opportunism, Commissioner Sheldon chose to read Gunter’s frustrations into the public record. And as unseemly as this spectacle was, Sheldon did not stop there; he provided copies of the email to members of the press and the attending public. 
I have seen this tactic used before, most recently in the disemboweling of Jack Miles’ military service record during the race for Port of Shelton Commissioner. While such an unsavory tactic is meant to damage an opponent’s credibility, it often says more about the person administering the damage. Sheldon used John’s unfortunate choice of words to bolster his own political ends, declaring that he would not be bullied into a decision on the sewer project.
Be that as it may, Gunter made a good case and commissioners voted to reject the grant from the Department of Ecology, effectively halting the Belfair Sewer Project, at least for the time being. Commissioner Ring-Erickson tried to make political hay by saying she had long been opposed to construction of Phase ll. I don’t remember it quite that way, but then I’m a bit deaf in that ear.
At the end of the day, Mr. Gunter stuck his neck out and walked away with a slap on the wrist and a victory for his community; Mr. Sheldon gave us a peak at the man behind the smile; Mr. Bloomfield remained coiled to make a bad decision on future commissioner pay; and Ms. Erickson learned that even the unwanted chickens eventually find their way home. 

It’s good to know there are people out there still willing to get their nose a little bloodied fighting for their community. Of course, we could do ourselves a big favor and just stop voting our problems into office, but from experience we seem to learn nothing.
As for me, I am busy converting a work shed into a chicken coop. No one goes through life without acquiring a few chickens along the way, so you might as well get ready for the time when they come home to roost.
Later…

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

IS GREEN DIAMOND A GOOD NEIGHBOR?

LAKE NAHWATZEL

Submitted to Shelton Blog by Elizabeth Livesay  Mason County Progressive
 

YOU SHOULD CARE ABOUT THIS! 
YOU MIGHT BE NEXT!

Is Green Diamond being a good neighbor? 

If you live in Mason County, you should be interested in this question, as Green Diamond is busy trying to convert forestland all over the County.  The company works so diligently to keep its activities secret from its neighbors that no one at Lake Nahwatzel, not even adjacent landowners, knew what it had been up to for a year and a half. 

The County, inexplicably, seems to be representing only Green Diamond’s interests, even though one would expect our officials to protect not only a precious asset, but citizens as well.  Let me describe to you the hearing that the Friends of Lake Nahwatzel had last week on the rezone proposal for the lake.

Friends of Lake Nahwatzel is made up of summer residents and a few permanent homeowners.  We are ordinary people who happen to feel deeply about our homes, and the beauty and health of the lake.  We care about the wildlife which lives here, the pristine shoreline, the clear water, and the rural atmosphere. Just ordinary people...

Green Diamond, on the other hand, did not come to the hearing to represent itself as a neighbor. Green Diamond sent the Seattle law firm Foster-Pepper, with its multiple attorneys, laptop computers, and highly paid expert witnesses.  Green Diamond hired a firm, Wetland Resources, Inc, to survey the wildlife, water, wetlands, etc.  Haven’t heard of them?  They’re from Seattle, too. 

Friends of Lake Nahwatzel gathers its resources the hard way:  We hit each other up for funds, and we scanned our members for people who have expertise in a needed area:  a wildlife biologist, a diver with a water-quality company, a homeowner with knowledge of boating issues, another who speaks about traffic.  We are lucky to have a retired professional forester to counter Green Diamond’s claims that this rezone makes sense, and a pilot who donates his time and plane to photograph the wider area from the air.

Friends of Lake Nahwatzel actually represents the interests of anyone in Mason County who is in danger of being bullied by Green Diamond.  We did a good job at this hearing.  When Green Diamond’s big-city lawyer presented his water-quality witness (from California), it was apparent this was a man who testifies for a living:  smooth and glib. 

But we have passion on our side, and our own highly qualified witnesses.


Our water-quality expert spends his life under water — Western Washington water.  

Our wildlife biologist (a retired lake resident) has not only a BS and an MA in wildlife biology, but decades of experience as well.  He presented indisputable evidence of the permanent  harm that will be done to all the species, from the Lake to the Olympics, who depend on the water and the old-growth-like habitat along the north shore.  

Our forester helped expose the fallacies presented by Green Diamond as justification for taking this land out of forest production.  

Their representative stated that they were obligated to find the “highest and best use” for this land.  When pressed, he acknowledged that means dollar value.  They can get more money if they sell the land to a developer.  It’s all about the money.

Green Diamond does not care about its neighbors.  It does not care about the species which will disappear when the old-growth-like forest is cut.  It does not care about the fact that Lake Nahwatzel is one of the cleanest in the state, is very shallow, and cannot tolerate the increased runoff inevitable from a development. 

The Reed family (who owns Green Diamond) apparently no longer cares about being good community partners. They care about the money.  And the County is letting them get away with it.

You should care about this.  You might be next.


Photo: www.sellingwastate.com


SHELTON BLOG NOTE:

Monday, October 8, 2012

A CHANCE FOR CHANGE IN MASON COUNTY


OUR LIVES REALLY DO DEPEND ON IT!

Submitted to Shelton Blog by Katherine Price   Mason County Progressive

Mason County is presently the poster child for dysfunctional government.  We seem to attract the "wrong" sort on many levels.  

For some years, I have watched our various "government leaders" turn our County into a waste dump for treated sewage (Webb Hill), and allow the lower Skokomish River and the mouth of the Canal to become an outhouse for fishermen each year. I have seen and smelled Simpson burning away in the harbor no matter what the air quality, while waiting for the other shoe to drop in the future when the Port of Shelton or the County of Mason (or both?) allow another biomass incinerator to be built over our heads.  Seeing all this has been a little frustrating.

But now, we have a chance to replace the leadership at the County Commission with a full, clean slate. I hope we do not blow it.

I attended the 31st Oysterfest this weekend, under the smoke of an unusual October wildfire, and experienced firsthand what too much smoke from burning does.  I have never respected our firefighters more, or prayed harder for their safe-keeping.  The several hours I breathed that wildfire smoke caused me to act for two days like a cat trying to hack up a fur ball -- my husband said I should go out on Halloween as Golem from the Lord of the Rings, because trying to hack up particulate matter made me sound perfectly Golem.  

And then there were the nose bleeds...apparently all that lovely particulate matter really messes up the sinuses!  And I had never thought of myself as one of the "at risk" members of the public: Not too young, not too old, no respiratory complaints to speak of (until this weekend), no preexisting conditions that would land me in the groups most at risk for dying from breathing particulate matter... and yet, I experienced some real problems from the smoke.

I would like to see the statistics for how many folks were treated at Mason General Hospital for complaints linked to the smoke, if anyone has access to such information.

We are terribly blessed in Mason County that our firefighters are some of the most dedicated in the country, and further blessed by lots of help from the State of Washington. Given the tinder dry conditions that existed when the fire started, we are lucky to have suffered only as much as we did.  

For those who experienced the ill effects of the smoke, remember ADAGE?  It promised us high levels of particulate matter on a daily basis, every day, all year round.  We dodged a pretty big bullet on that one, and the folks closest to the fire can now do more than just imagine what ADAGE would have done to our health and community.

And now, the specter of a Solomon Renewable Energy Co. incinerator has raised it's ugly head again... so far only in rumors, but it pays the citizens of Mason County to give credence to some rumors because our elected officials love to do things "under the radar" and out of sight of the citizens until the deal is nearly done.  Lake Nahwatzel residents know this all too well!

Thanks to this blog for the link to the air monitor, which I checked many times this weekend.  We had a scary weekend, and the rain has not come yet, so everyone needs to be extra careful.

If you did not like that smoke, if it caused you distress, or distress to people you care about, then be on the alert for signs that a another "ADAGE" might be coming to town, or that the
Solomon Renewable Energy Co. incinerator is rearing it's ugly head in more than just rumors.

If you want to protect yourselves from
the toxic effects of increased exposure to inhaled particulate matter from burning wood (i.e. another biomass incinerator burning legally 24/7/365), then you better be sure to vote your ballots when they arrive on or about the 19th of October, and you better vote for the candidates who think that citizens health trumps corporate profit every day of the week. 

Vote for the County Commissioners who will take our concerns seriously, who will look at the science and the medicine, and who will take advice form the medical and scientific community, as well as from citizens.

Vote for Roslynne Reed, Denny Hamilton and Ross Gallagher for clean air and clean water.

 
Vote as if your lives depend on it, because after the recent fires, we know what we can expect.  Even those who thought we were not in the "at risk" groups can testify as to how our bodies react when we breathe in too much particulate matter 2.5.

Lastly, I love Oysterfest!  I don't know if we will have one next year without our fairgrounds, and while I went out with full knowledge that the air was bad, very bad, how many people there had no idea how bad it was?

I want to know why the Mason County Health Department let Oysterfest go forward when the air was so compromised?


I am curious why the Mason County Health Department did not have people at the gate recommending "at risk" members of the public wear masks or go home?

I consider this just par for the course with our Health Department... allowing thousands of people to spends hours in the smoke, including the campers who were in it 24/7 for as many as three days.  

Mason County Health Department has been criticized on many occasions when it comes to air quality and the compromised health of our citizens.

I am hopeful that under the new leadership of Reed, Hamilton and Gallagher, there will be some improvements in the Health Department, and that the Health Department becomes more than a cover-up agency doing the bidding of Sheldon and Ring Erickson, minimizing health risks to our citizens, and telling us we all get cancer in Mason County because we all smoke cigarettes and eat badly.  It cannot possibly be environmental, right?

 
Remember, under this Health Department, and with the current commissioners at the helm, we have achieved the inglorious distinction of being number one in incidences of cancer in Washington's counties.

Vote wisely fellow air-breathers.  Our lives really do depend on it!


Graphic: www.123rf.com 

Sunday, October 7, 2012

PROFESSIONAL POLITICIANS NEEDN'T APPLY

WANTED: MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Submitted to Shelton Blog by Tom Davis    Mason County Progressive

Mason County is looking to hire three new commissioners. Duties include showing up to meetings on time, listening to citizen concerns and putting community needs before your own.

The successful candidate will possess a heart that works in conjunction with his or her brain, a small ego and a large understanding of people.

Education is not as important as life experience, so long as that experience includes people, and not just corporations. 

Applicants must be prepared to work 20 to 80 hours a week, depending on local conditions, and be available to address the needs of a broad range of ongoing issues.
   
Must be able to work with other municipalities toward a common goal for the common good, and not just go off and do your own thing.

Applicants need not to have been a resident of Mason County for 60 years, but should have a firm grasp on local conditions and bring feasible solutions to chronic problems. 
  
Above all, the successful candidate will have a proven track record of volunteerism, community involvement and a willingness to listen to new ideas.

Due to a series of unfortunate episodes, it is necessary to list some characteristics that are deemed undesirable for the position: 
a) Finding ways to ignore citizen concerns
b) Generating unnecessary lawsuits
c) Keeping commissioner salaries inexcusably high
d) Obfuscating the issues
For these reasons, advocates for special interests and professional politicians need not apply.

For more information, applicants are encouraged to take a long look in the mirror and ask themselves: Do I really care about my community or am I just in this for a paycheck?

Applications can be downloaded at WWW.NOMORETIM@ALL, and must be postmarked by midnight, Nov. 6th, 2012.
(Last pickup for drop offs is 8:00 PM.)

Mason County strives to be an equal opportunity employer.

Photo by John Cox 

Saturday, October 6, 2012

VOTE YES ON WA I-522 TO LABEL GMO FOOD

VOTE YES here in WA on I-522
 (Proposition 37 mentioned in the video is for CA)

SHELTON BLOG NOTE:  Mason County Progressive

Link to previous post for more information on WA I-522:
http://masoncountyprogressive.blogspot.com/2012/09/yes-on-i-522-its-our-right-to-know.html

Friday, October 5, 2012

WEEK OF 10/1/12 MEETINGS IN REVIEW


TOM'S TALES FOR THE WEEK

Submitted to Shelton Blog by Tom Davis    Mason County Progressive     
There’s a lot of ground to cover this week so let’s get to it:

Monday. October 1, 2012

9:00 AM Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) Briefing
 

Nine items were on the agenda, including three Executive Sessions and one Closed Session:
 
Executive Session - RCW 42.30.110 (1)(g) - Personnel
Executive Session - RCW 42.30.110 (1)(i) Potential Litigation
Executive Session - RCW 42.30.110 (1)(b) Real Estate
Closed Session - RCW 42.30.140 (4) Labor Discussion

That left five items. Here’s the two that grabbed me:

Diane Zoren of Central Operations brought up the issue of Commissioner salaries, and you could almost hear the puckering of three behinds slamming shut. Those in attendance were made to endure another round of how Commissioners donate some of their hard earned pennies to charity or give it back to the General Fund, and then walk barefoot through the snow to do the public’s work.


Long, long, story short: Tim wants to tie the salaries of incoming Commissioners to that of a Superior Court Judge, which is just another way of keeping their salaries egregiously high and out of local control. As for the resolution presented by Mason County Democrats requiring the Commissioners to roll back their salaries to the 2008 level, it hit the circle file so hard it was still spinning when I left the room. There’s more to this sad tale, but let’s wait till they work up the nerve to throw this piece of convoluted thinking on the agenda.


Tom Moore and John Cunningham from Utilities and Waste Management had a sad tale of their own: If the County rejects the $4.98M grant from the Dept. of Ecology to fund construction of Phase ll of the Belfair Sewer Project, there’s no way to pay for Phase l except with rate hikes for existing customers. OMG, who would have thought? Well, how about the 20 or so people who spoke up at the public hearings a year ago --  it’s exactly what they said might happen.


Here’s the thing: When the County went to war over a couple of thousand dollars difference in the purchase price of a piece of dirt they needed for a pump station, people said “Don’t do it.” But did the County listen? Yep, $575,000 later.  And when the County said we need to put a sewage treatment plant up in the Belfair UGA, and the people said, okay, but just a small one, did the County listen? Yep, to the tune of a $48M temple to poop which they can’t pay for. Revisionism, I cannot wait to hear how your pot doth boil over.


6:00 PM: City of Shelton Commission Meeting
 

Most of the meeting was about money; budget this, budget that, but that’s no fun -- let’s talk about fireworks, or more specifically, no fireworks: 

Ordinance No. 1809-0912 – Second Reading - An Ordinance of the City of Shelton, Washington Amending Chapter 8.64 of the Shelton Municipal Code Relating to the Regulation of Fireworks.
Two people testified in favor of “safe and sane” fireworks, saying they’re not at all like the A-bombs you get on the reservation. Besides, what kind of a country do we live in when a man can’t even blow off his own finger without big government butting in? Then there’s the economics of fireworks: all the grandmothers and schoolmarms just trying to make ends meet by selling explosives to children in parking lots all across this great city of ours (at least that’s the way I hear "stupid" inside my head). 

The Commissioners waited until the talking stopped and then unanimously approved amendments to the existing ordinance, effective one year from this day, as follows:

8.64.020 Sale, Possession and Use of Fireworks:
A. No fireworks shall be sold or offered for sale within
the City of Shelton.
B. No person shall ignite, discharge, use or explode any
fireworks within the City except as authorized in this chapter.
C. No person shall ignite, discharge, use, or explode any
"safe and sane" fireworks or ignitable "trick and novelty
devices", as that term is defined in WAC 212-70-030.
within the City except as authorized in this chapter.

Tuesday, October 2, 2012
 

9:00 AM: Regular session of Board of County Commissioners

Not too much on the agenda, and public comment was limited to an elderly gentlemen who scolded Commissioners for trying to award a no bid contract to Allied Waste, albeit a little late to the party. What was more interesting was Commissioner Sheldon’s response. He said lawyers were looking into whether the competitive bidding process applied to solid waste hauling contracts, indicating the County may appeal, rather than comply with the Superior Court ruling. That remark rang true for me, as I have long ago pegged Tim as someone who thinks little of wasting public money to indulge his ego.


John Gunter, chair of the Belfair Citizens Advisory Committee told Commissioners the committee was unanimous in their recommendation to reject a $4.98M grant from the Dept. of Ecology, effectively ending the project, at least in its current configuration.

We’ll see…
 

Let’s see, what else happened? Oh, yeah, Diane Zoren, head honcho of Central Operations got a $361 a month raise, making her the highest paid Mason County employee whose last name starts with the letter Z. 

2:00 PM: Port of Shelton Commission Meeting


Money was all the talk at the Port, too, as the Budget Hearing drew a record number of public comments: none. I liken the Port’s budget process to that of my wife going “window shopping” with a handful of credit cards: you know it’s not going to end well, but what can you say?

 
Commissioner Jay Hupp had a three page list of questions he wanted to ask, but Taylor and Wallitner were both in a hell-fire hurry to approve the budget. For a while they went back and forth, with attorney Skip Houser clearly on the side of the other two Commissioners. In a rare moment of truth, Director Dobson looked across the table at Hupp, and told Hupp that it was he (Dobson) who had the expertise in this matter. The message was clear: back off, there’s a new old gang in town and they’re not afraid to draw blood. 

Final score: Yeas 2; Nays 1 -- The budget was approved without addressing one of Hupp’s concerns.  


Build a Frankenstein, live with a Frankenstein.    


Later…
      

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

MASON COUNTY HAS GASTRO-SHELDON-ITIS!


THE CURE IS ROSLYNNE REED!

Submitted to Shelton Blog by Katherine Price  Mason County Progressive

During the re-election campaign for George Bush, our Commissioner/Senator Tim Sheldon started a group to support the re-election of George Bush, and called it Democrats to Re-elect George Bush, or something similar. I never heard much more about that particular group, but the very idea that even one Democrat would want to re-elect Bush was beyond my understanding.

I did a little Google search this morning of our illustrious Commissioner/
Senator Sheldon and found some interesting facts from the Kitsap Sun's writer Steven Gardner.

One article, written in 2010, discussed the bills that were introduced in the Legislature, which were defeated, but which, if they would have won approval, "would have prohibited an elected office-holder at the city, county or state levels from being elected to another such job". Clearly, if those bills had passed, Sheldon would not have been able to run again for his Board of County Commission job.

But what appeared in that article that was more interesting was: "But according to Sheldon it won't be an issue in 2012, because he doesn't plan to seek re-election as a County Commissioner that year." Which year would be this year, which leads me to the conclusion that our Commissioner/Senator is either suffering from early dementia, or that he is a flat out liar. Frankly, I have heard enough drivel from said Commissioner/Senator to feel right comfortable calling him a liar, here and to his face.

The article I was reading also talked about how popular our Commissioner/Senator is with Republicans, so much so that when Dan Griffey thought of running against him as a Republican, he is quoted in an email as saying: "I was told that the House had a greater need of my service than the Senate." It is not certain who told him, but I suspect it was the Republican Party.

Randy Netherlin got a similar message in 2006, when he reports being told by a state party official that "if the district Republican Party put anyone up against Sheldon, it wouldn't get any money from the state for the two 35th District House Races." Interesting, how the Republicans, who usually only protect their own, would protect our sometimes Democratic, sometimes Independent, Tim Sheldon.

The article ends with Tim defending his dual elected roles: "It sometimes stretches your time, but it does keep you in touch with your local community," Sheldon said. "It seems to work for my constituents or they would not have re-elected me in 2008."


Well let's look at that 2008 campaign; the Mason County Democrats ran an untested, political novice, against the County's favorite good ol boy, and she lost.  One wonders how much her seeming inexperience counted against her, and how much her color -- she is Native American -- and/or her sex -- "she" being obviously female.

Fast forward to 2012:  Mason County Democrats are supporting Roslynne Reed, a woman of color, and female to be sure. But this time the candidate has been tested, the experience she brings to the job of County Commissioner is considerable, and she has a substantial record of working to improve our County for its citizens. 

Mason County Republicans are, as always, supporting Tim Sheldon.

But more about Tim...

Remember the Shelton-Mason County Journal article from April 9, 2009, titled "Open season on criminals"? This is where Tim shines one of his brightest light on his failure as a community leader.

As the County Commission reduced funds for the Sheriff's Department, Sheldon invites us to arm ourselves and to defend ourselves. Specifically, he stated:

"There is no bag limit. There's always an open season on criminals in Mason County. I think the Mason County citizens are very well aware of how to protect themselves in a situation that might need a response. I think our citizens network very well and are very involved in crime watch activities and other things."

And our Sheriff's comment when he heard about this statement was: "Holy Cow!"

Sheriff Salisbury added: "This sheriff, and this sheriff's office, believes in the rule of law and the legal process."

"There's always an open season on criminals in Mason County."  Holy Cow indeed! The Senator/Commissioner's position was that we have guns and we should use them to protect ourselves. And not long after this comment, one of our elderly citizens did just that with his gun and defended his actions by quoting our Tim Sheldon.

But back to why I have such nerve to call such a powerful and important man a liar? Well, starting with "I won't run in 2012" to the lie he told at the Commission Meeting about giving his outrageous raise money back to the County. Ask Auditor Karen Herr that question, as was done by KMAS, and you might get a different answer.

Ms. Herr recommended that the commissioners find a way to undo their mandated annual three percent raise (Commission Meeting on September 4, 2012). After the Commissioners' Meeting, Sheldon told KMAS radio that he has given back to the County any raise he had. "I've written a check to Mason County for that money."

Karen Herr wrote to KMAS that Tim's statement was "inaccurate" (she is too polite to say he lied).

Ms. Herr wrote:

"For what it's worth, the statement 'the Commissioners have returned their increases by writing a check to put their raises back into the County coffers each month' is not a true statement. Ring Erickson has never returned any salary (she took a reduction in medical) -- Sheldon returned salary increase for two years (our of eight); and Jerry Lingle returned a portion for one year."

So what can we learn from Tim Sheldon's statements and his actions, especially the ones that are contradictory?   We can agree that he is not to be trusted, and that he lies. And what should we do?  We should unseat him.  First from the Board of County Commissioners, and later from the State Legislature.

I hope that our blog readers will share with us their own favorite Tim quotes. Especially if someone has the full quote of his "hot lead enema" statement for those who want to commit crime in Tombstone... I mean in Mason County.

Every day I think about how amazing we could make our community if we replaced the existing BOCC with Roslynne Reed, Denny Hamilton, and Ross Gallagher.

  • Ross has experience in the job itself and will help bring our new commissioners, Reed and Hamilton, up to speed in short order.
  • A lot of things are going on in Mason County, many of them "under the radar", just as our elected officials like.
  • We need transparency in our county government, we need the commissioners to tell us who is approaching them for what and how industry plans will affect citizens.
  • We badly need the citizens to be HEARD when they speak to the commissioners, not talked down to and sneered at.
In Mason County right now we have opportunities, and we have challenges, and we also have a dysfunctional Board of County Commissioners. If we want to see a better future for our children, grandchildren, and ourselves, then we absolutely need a clean sweep on the Board of County Commissioners. 

Graphic: www.istockphoto.com 

SHELTON BLOG NOTE:

Link to related KMAS article:
http://masoncountydailynews.com/news/news-page/38549-auditor-disagrees-with-commissioner-statements

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

VANDANA SHIVA: SEED FREEDOM

Submitted to Shelton Blog by Pat Jerrells    Mason County Progressive

Monday, October 1, 2012

9/26/12 SHELTON HILLS MEETING REPORT


EIS Scoping Meeting for Shelton Hills 
600 Acre Mixed Use Development  
(Shelton, WA)

Submitted to Shelton Blog by Katherine Price Mason County Progressive  

I attended a public meeting at the City of Shelton Civic Center on Wednesday, September 26, 2012. The topic of conversation was the scoping for the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Shelton Hills Development that the Hall Equities Group is planning for the 600 acres they own near the Wallace Kneeland interchange in Shelton.

First, let me express my frustration,
which was shared by other members of the public, that we will only have access to the full underlying documents on the City's website by Friday, September 28. The comment period closes the following Friday, October 5th. 

Steve Goins of the City of Shelton held up the published version of the documents and I would guess it is approximately 2 inches of paper. I think that a one week period of time to digest, investigate, question, and comment is ridiculous, and hope that if any of our readers feel the same way, that they let Steve Goins know.

I, for one, will be calling Steve and asking for an extension to, at a minimum, October 12, 2012.  Some folks, myself included, work five days a week, have families, homes and lives, that make the one week time frame difficult.  I would assume that is not the intention of the City, that they fully intend to allow us enough time to make intelligent comments based on a review of the underlying documents, and that very shortly we will be advised that the comment period has been extended. 

Absent that, some of us will have to take time off of work, give up sleeping, or stop taking care of our houses and families, so that we can wade through the documentation and put together intelligent comments and questions. 

For those folks in Mason County who were up against the clock on various ADAGE matters, this won't be unusual behavior.  But for the City of Shelton to appear adversarial, as Steve Goins appeared the night of the meeting, is not what we have come to expect from the City of Shelton. The Port of Shelton, yes, but not the City.

Full disclosure requires me to say that I expressed my fervent desire for this project to proceed when the Port of Shelton opposed it.  I would have, at that time, during the passions of ADAGE, been against anything the Port was for, and for anything the Port was against.  I still believe this project can be a wonderful benefit to our community, and it also has the possibility to not be a wonderful benefit to our community.  This is the reason why it is so important that we be allowed sufficient time to inform ourselves in connection with what has been done, what is planned, and whether these plans will enhance our community.

In the summary portion of the presentation, we were given some bare bones facts:

  • The site contains 600 acres.
  • Fifty acres are to be designated for the business park, which hopes to attract new business to our community.
  • 150 acres are to be designated for housing, and they intend that 150 acres to provide 1,600 units of housing.
  • Goose Lake is inside the project, but will be cleaned up under the auspices of the Department of Ecology, and deeded to the City of Shelton by ITT Rayonier, Inc.
If each unit of housing has an average of 2 residents, I immediately wondered how existing services will accommodate another 3,200 citizens.  What kind of strain would that put on our fire and emergency services, on our police, schools, sewer, water and roads?  It will have a significant impact I think.

Many of the folks present commented.

I was particularly impressed by Denny Hamilton and his succinct comments and concerns about the aquifer recharge areas under the proposed development.  Denny also suggested to the developers that solar street lights be included in the development.  Further, as a Fire Commissioner, Denny stressed the need for pass through streets rather than cul de sacs to make things easier for firefighters.

Matt Matayoshi of the EDC mumbled something about economics, and thankfully kept his comments short.

Tom Davis commented on the reconfiguration of the Wallace Kneeland Boulevard interchange; recommended that the developers hire local where and when they can; and suggested that a piece of ground be set aside for the YMCA that we hope to be bringing to our community soon.  Tom also stated that he has seen developments done well, and ones done not so well.  He hopes that this one will be done well, and that the housing will also include single family residences that might attract more people than just those looking for low income/affordable housing.

Roslynne Reed expressed concern about the impact of the influx of cars that 1600 residences will likely bring.

Terri Thompson and Pat Vandehey did a tag team question and comment session that involved their concerns for aquifer protection, impermeable surfaces (210 acres of it), concerns about storm water run off into local wetlands and Goldsborough Creek, and stated that at least two special permits would be required in connection with the storm water drain off.  They had questions about where the 2 million cubic yards taken from the site will end up, and where and what are the critical areas affected by the planned development.  In fact, Pat believes there should be no new development until we know where these critical aquifer areas are in relation to the proposed project.

Doug Sayan expressed concern for increased traffic by our junior high school.

Terri Thompson then reminded us that there is an abandoned landfill where the proposed project is, and one of the attendees not known to me asked if anyone was old enough to remember Love Canal.  And yes, I am.

Pat Vandehey asked why the citizens (through the Department of Ecology if I am not mistaken) were paying $200,000 to help with the Goose Lake clean up/reclamation project, since ITT Rayonier, Inc. poisoned the lake and the land in the first place.  Steve Goins said that money was used to create the schematic the City has of the lake and proposed amenities, and that there is still some money left.

All in all, there were many questions, some of which were not answered, but will be used in the scoping process.
 

The gentlemen from the Hall Equities Group (Brandon Farrell and Kim Adams) assured us that they are in this for the long haul, and they consider this a 20 year plan.  They have owned the property for 6 years and had to engage in a lengthy legal battle which was recently resolved in their favor.

Now we need to see the nuts and bolts of the project; need to find out how much of the land is contaminated, and in what way it is contaminated; and hundreds of other questions that arise now that the project seems to be truly moving forward.

Steve Goins said it can take 4-6 months to complete the draft EIS, at which time we will be allowed to comment again.  Hopefully there will be more than one week to digest an EIS and make intelligent comments.  Steve also estimated 9-12 months before the project begins.

I left with many more questions than I came with, but am cautiously hopeful that this project will be a good thing for our community.  But we need to know a whole lot more before the citizens can put their seal of approval on the project.

If some of our readers also think that one week is a little too short a time to review, discuss, digest and comment on a project of this scope, please call Steve Goins at the City of Shelton at 432-5136.  You can also call Dave O'Leary, the City Administrator, at 432-5110.  I find that calling both Mr. O'Leary and Mr. Goins produces the best results.


This is a huge project, it is incredibly detailed, it affects things all over the community, from our water and sewer to our roads and emergency services. We really need to study this hard to be sure that it is the right thing for Shelton, and the right thing for future residents.

Remember Love Canal?

If not, please google it and inform yourselves as to what a nightmare building homes and schools on toxic sites can be for a community.

Happy reading activists!  It seems we have had a slight break from ADAGE, and Solomon, and that we are going to have to clean our eyeglasses, sharpen our pencils, and get to work providing helpful comments and questions to the City of Shelton.